Thanks to both of you! that is what I thought too, but you never now what dirty tricks may get invented by somebody.
Christian > Matthew Graves <[email protected]> hat am 29. Mai 2013 um 12:26 geschrieben: > > hi Christian. as Grahame said you would need to be able to calculate all the > values you want in the array without needing to be on the frame for an > unsimulated option. Sorry i was unclear on that. > > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Grahame Fuller <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > > > In general it's not possible without a simulation, unless there's a > > > formula you can use to calculate the per-frame values a priori. > > > > gray > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto: > > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Christian > > Freisleder > > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 03:06 PM > > To: [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: ICE - Record Variable in Array for every frame > > > > "if its not simulated u can build an array of size=no. of frames and > > populate it with the lengths from each frame." > > > > how do you build an array on an unsimulated ice tree that is holding > > values of other frames than the current??? > > maybe I don't understand your explanation, but it doesnt't work for me. > > as this would be rather helpful, I would love to learn about this trick. > > > > thanks > > Christian > > > > > > > > Am 24.05.2013 14:17, schrieb Matthew Graves: > > > Hi. If you are using a simulated ICE tree you can get an array add the > > > new data to it using the build array node and then set it each frame. > > > this will build a list of lengths upto the current frame. or if its > > > not simulated u can build an array of size=no. of frames and populate > > > it with the lengths from each frame. > > > is this what you are looking for? > > > Matt > > >
