While we are at it, out of interest:
could you elaborate a bit what the part of Softimage is that is married
so tightly to Windows? UI, event handling, whatever...?
Is Soft not laid out in a way so that higher functional levels sit atop
'abstract' lower level ones, so you could make changes down there
comparatively easy?
Thanks!
Eugen
------ Originalnachricht ------
Von: "Luc-Eric Rousseau" <luceri...@gmail.com>
An: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com" <softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Gesendet: 14.02.2014 15:10:38
Betreff: Re: Survey - how would you do this?
Unfortunately it will be Softimages achilles heel if they don't find
a way off of it (which is unlikely given the very small dev team)
COM doesn't scale the way new 3d apps require. To many bottlenecks.
It's moot, but COM is fine, it's no more or less scalable than C++.
Firefox is entirely built with a cross platform clone of COM, called
XPCOM. The problem is that we made XSI only for a Windows NT-only
future. The mainwin decision was meant to be something temporary until
SGI died out. It's not just COM, it's a 100% windows sdk app.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Angus Davidson
<angus.david...@wits.ac.za> wrote:
Jumping into Modo for my first attempt at particles. Managed to get
the following after my allotted 5 minutes
pic.twitter.com/EDOKamNkkn
Just used a plain cube as a poly source. Need to update that with a
more random rock ;)
---
Diese E-Mail ist frei von Viren und Malware, denn der avast! Antivirus Schutz
ist aktiv.
http://www.avast.com
