Mostly a lack of respect.

________________________________
From: Ben Rogall [xsi_l...@shaders.moederogall.com]
Sent: 04 March 2014 07:42 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage transition audience poll

Yep. Or $4495 for a workstation license and then $2495 per year. For a minute 
there it looked like Autodesk was doing something half reasonable with the free 
transition offer to Softimage + Maya. But then I saw that accepting that means 
that I would not be allowed to use Softimage at all after February 2016. I'm 
not even sure what Autodesk gains from that.

Ben

On 3/4/2014 11:00 AM, Francois Lord wrote:
What I find interesting in the fact that people want to jump the Autodesk boat 
is that they seem to forget they have to buy a new software.
For a company that relies entirely on Softimage, that decision is not a cheap 
one. Houdini is 7000$ for a floating license plus 4000$ per year!
http://www.sidefx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=385&Itemid=190

In two years when Bifrost will be nearing maturity, Maya will become a lot more 
appealing if you stay on subscription. Be kind with your bean counter.

just sayin.

On 04-Mar-14 11:37, Alan Fregtman wrote:
I've set up a poll out of curiosity...

Where will you transition to when Softimage falls? Vote!

http://strawpoll.me/1257710

(Multiple-choice allowed btw.)




<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" 
style="width:100%;">
<tr>
<td align="left" style="text-align:justify;"><font face="arial,sans-serif" 
size="1" color="#999999"><span style="font-size:11px;">This communication is 
intended for the addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original 
message. You may not copy or disseminate this communication without the 
permission of the University. Only authorised signatories are competent to 
enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus 
advised that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the 
University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which 
are not necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the 
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and 
outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in 
writing to the contrary. </span></font></td>
</tr>
</table>

Reply via email to