Yeah, what he said.

--------------------------------------------
Eric Thivierge
http://www.ethivierge.com


On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Raffaele Fragapane <
raffsxsil...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Let me clarify that I'm not saying you have it easy by any means, but as
> an individual you are in control of you own time, unconditionally.
> You don't NEED TO drop Soft right now (unless the job market withers
> instantly), you can keep doing business as usual as an individual for at
> least a few months, and go in crunch time to re-educate yourself freely in
> your spare time. That's by no means ideal, or even nice, but you can do it;
> you can turn on a dime.
>
> You decide to learn rigging in Maya? You can still model in Soft, you are
> a one man band pipe, that's a no brainer, and then you can double up your
> rigging effort to rig the thing in Soft for your client output, and try to
> replicate it in Maya at night.
>
> Unless you have, and need to, work for 16 hours a day you should have a
> pile of free time you wouldn't have been able to monetize otherwise that
> you now have to "invest", even if against your will.
>
> As a company it's not that simple. You don't have such a commodity as non
> monetized time. Every single minute of your employees is paid for in one
> way or another. Money, TIL, or if you don't offer recompense for overtime
> much worse consequences. You do not have the same agility, simple as that,
> and while as an individual you are fully in control of your assets and Q/C
> is in built in the work itself, as a company those interim stage have
> considerable added cost and require refactoring.
>
> Now, again, please don't think I'm downplaying this. We all have hobbies,
> or families, or excees of work, or a mix of those, and it's a very, very
> real cost to sacrifice any of those for the sake of re qualifying yourself.
> If it's not an economic cost (no work excess you can sell), at the very
> least it's a considerable emotional and intellectual effort which is very
> likely to drain you, and sustained for too long will eventually affect the
> money earning hours of your day, and is therefore to be managed carefully.
>
> The only reason I'm continuing this debate isn't for the sake of argument,
> it's because I'm witnessing a lot of defeatism, and purely out of care for
> my peers and a community I've been part of for my entire adult life I'd
> like to see people shake free of it.
> Saying that changing application will demote you to junior for a while is
> non-sense. The distinction between a junior and a senior is NOT their
> software dexterity, if it was we'd look for app monkeys and would never
> re-train people across software.
> The distinction between a junior and a senior is experience, ingenuity
> matured into applicable skills, the ability to think logically and
> critically under pressure, the sum of all their projects giving them vision
> over the next. Nobody will take any of that away from you, don't let
> anything or anybody EVER convince you that you are the software you use. It
> has impact, considerable impact, but it only defines a very small part of
> your overall value.
>

Reply via email to