The mentions of the cloud for MnE as a success factor like it might have been or become in CAD are, presently, scaring the living daylight out of me a lot more than Maya's obvious deficiencies ever might. I can deal with the latter, the former however would be a legal impossibility to deal with, and there's only that many times one can reboot a pipeline to new software in a few years.
Back then Bass came up with this massive cloud testicle fondling, but Petit was quick in addressing it and stating that MnE wouldn't fall under the same priorities, though he seemed to have been gone largely unacknowledged by Bass at the times it's true that nothing happened outside the CAD front for the years following. I wonder how much longer that will go on for and what the current management (Bradshaw and Stevens I'd guess? Maybe the PMs and PM senior management) thinks of it. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jason S <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder how much Composite or Matchmover costs every year.. while still > being around... > > > On 03/23/14 19:42, Angus Davidson wrote: > >> Well my response is that we will teach maya while its still an industry >> standard. We will re-evaluate in 2 years time. The noises coming out of >> people in my country is that most are moving to a modo / zbrush / houdini >> pipeline while continuing to use SI as much as possible. >> >> For my personal stuff I am already on the Modo ship and thanks to Jordi's >> excellent pdfs dipping my feet into Houdini as well. >> >> Personally I will not give Autodesk any more money. >> >> Kind regards >> >> Angus >> >> > > -- Our users will know fear and cower before our software! Ship it! Ship it and let them flee like the dogs they are!
