I didn't know they meant urine colored bright.

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:46 PM, John Richard Sanchez <
youngupstar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The Future is Bright!
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Jason S <jasonsta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07/14/15 9:46, Chris Marshall wrote:
>>
>>> Is it me or is this rather expensive?
>>>
>>>
>>>  Comparing rental with upgrading after a few years can be steep,
>> but the difference between rental and traditional subs (also with
>> updates) can also be considerable.
>>
>> Say for 6 years,
>> 4.5k for 3yrs (the longest and most affordable commitment option) X 2
>> (for 6 yrs)   = 9k
>> compared to 3.5k the first year and ~600 per year for each subsequent 5
>> years = 6.5k (while ending-up with a license)
>>
>> For monthly, not that this would typically be used for long periods of
>> time,
>>  but for the sake of comparision, monthy price after 6 years comes to
>> 13.3k (while ending up with nothing)
>>
>> Studios mostly just absorb the difference (while I'm sure their not
>> exactly happy to pay quite a bit more for nothing),
>> and most people using it (in studios) don't have licences themselves,
>> which could explain the relative lack of backlash,
>> but it's freelancers and small shops that this arguably warrentless and
>> camouflaged 1.5x - 2x increase (while ending up with nothing) will hit the
>> hardest.
>>
>> Wonder if they would have tried it if a considerable competitor was
>> around, like say....
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> www.johnrichardsanchez.com
>



-- 
www.johnrichardsanchez.com

Reply via email to