I didn't know they meant urine colored bright. On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:46 PM, John Richard Sanchez < youngupstar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Future is Bright! > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Jason S <jasonsta...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 07/14/15 9:46, Chris Marshall wrote: >> >>> Is it me or is this rather expensive? >>> >>> >>> Comparing rental with upgrading after a few years can be steep, >> but the difference between rental and traditional subs (also with >> updates) can also be considerable. >> >> Say for 6 years, >> 4.5k for 3yrs (the longest and most affordable commitment option) X 2 >> (for 6 yrs) = 9k >> compared to 3.5k the first year and ~600 per year for each subsequent 5 >> years = 6.5k (while ending-up with a license) >> >> For monthly, not that this would typically be used for long periods of >> time, >> but for the sake of comparision, monthy price after 6 years comes to >> 13.3k (while ending up with nothing) >> >> Studios mostly just absorb the difference (while I'm sure their not >> exactly happy to pay quite a bit more for nothing), >> and most people using it (in studios) don't have licences themselves, >> which could explain the relative lack of backlash, >> but it's freelancers and small shops that this arguably warrentless and >> camouflaged 1.5x - 2x increase (while ending up with nothing) will hit the >> hardest. >> >> Wonder if they would have tried it if a considerable competitor was >> around, like say.... >> >> >> > > > -- > www.johnrichardsanchez.com > -- www.johnrichardsanchez.com
