Yes but no, but yes, but no.. :)
It does, but cameras are flipped in z or something, and allot of other
things are shait :)
Don't get me wrong, I love that awkward thing called blender, and I
think cycles is one of the best renders out there.
just allot of this:
http://giphy.com/gifs/confused-john-travolta-blender-26tP6eYNrkMhUsvJu/fullscreen
G
On 06/01/2016 19:04, Angus Davidson wrote:
Hi Gerbrand
Can Blender import FBX animations ?
Interested to hear that Cycles is so zippy.
Kind regards
Angus
*From:*Gerbrand Nel [mailto:nagv...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 06 January 2016 03:38 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Redshift users?
I'm also doing most of my work in Houdini indie at the moment.
With the whole 3rd party render restriction, I experimented with the
following:
Redshift in soft
Redshift in maya
Octane stand alone
Blender cycles
Octane standalone imported .abc files the best from houdini.
Soft and maya would loose things like fur, or get particle sizes mixed up
For me cycles seemed to be as good as octane, and sometimes even faster.
Some scenes were faster in redshift, and some were faster in cycles.
Blender being free makes it the obvious choice if you can get your
stuff in there.
obj, with mdd pointcache works well, but not everything can be
exported like this.
Waiting to see what redshift stand alone will be like, but as soon as
blender has alembic, there will be no contest imho.
G
On 06/01/2016 01:24, Tim Leydecker wrote:
I have one RS license but am not up to date with it atm because of
other stuff taking priority.
That said, I´m looking forward to having more time with Redshift
again.
In an ideal world, sidefx would allow to run Redshift with the
Indie Houdini license.
For me, tools Redshift3D, Substance Painter, UE4, Houdini have
brought back a lot of fun
to things that started to just feel like work.
I like the "Indie" approach most of them share and combined, it´s
awesome what is possible.
Cheers,
tim
Am 05.01.2016 um 19:13 schrieb Derek Jenson:
RS here as well! RS team supporting SI will keep Softimage
relevant for years to come. I look forward to the new features
planned for the 2.X cycle of development.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Redshift users?
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
From: digim...@digimata.com <mailto:digim...@digimata.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:03:56 -0500
We have switched to RS and haven't look back since.
On 05/01/2016 7:32 AM, Morten Bartholdy wrote:
Out of curiosity - how many of you have started using or
completely switched to Redshift?
Regards
Morten
This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is
confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and destroy the original message. You may not
copy or disseminate this communication without the permission of the
University. Only authorised signatories are competent to enter into
agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus advised
that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the
University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the
author, which are not necessarily the views and opinions of The
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between
the University and outsiders are subject to South African Law unless
the University agrees in writing to the contrary.
