If the current handlers remain as is (no change in config), What is the best way to enable handlers (especially new ones) to read arbitrary xml configuration?. The only possible solution is to use XPath which I see as very cumbersome.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> I'm raising my objection to -1 for the updated syntax. Let's make that a >>> post 1.3 (2.0, is my suggestion) feature. >> >> Users tend to stick to a released version for very long. A lot of >> users (we too) still use Solr 1.2. That means we are going to see this >> syntax for atleast another year after which we will ask the users to >> switch to a new syntax which they have been using for the past 2+ >> years. >>> > > I don't like <lst name="nodename"> either, but I don't think <nodename> > fixes it. Especially with the backwards compatibility issues > (complications). > > In 2.0 we should have a more considered syntax -- hopefully something > someone could buy a book (if necessary) to understand (spring) > > so I'm -1 on changing the syntax for 1.3 > > ryan > -- --Noble Paul
