SOLR-695 seems to be a move in the right direction. Now that Multicore is renamed to CoreContainer it should not confuse anyone. The reloadCore() should be a method in CoreContainer not CoreDescriptor .
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> * A CoreDescriptor taking a null multicore instance is fine because >>>> there is no multicore at all. >>> >>> Then we should, at a minimum, add a no-arg constructor, or at least >>> document >>> it can take null. Maybe then the name of the class is wrong. Class >>> names >>> are meaningful. And the name CoreDescriptor doesn't strike me as the >>> place >>> to hold Multicore. Overall, however, this reeks of the bigger problem in >>> that we treat 1 core as a special case instead of it being Multicore with >>> only a single core. >> > > In SOLR-695, all Cores (and CoreDescriptors) will require a valid > CoreContainer (MultiCore) -- passing null will not be an option. > > ryan > -- --Noble Paul
