On Dec 10, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 8-Dec-08, at 10:47 AM, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 7-Dec-08, at 7:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I would personally prefer more of an "elimination"-style vote
(i.e.,
STV).
Ah... yeah, that seems like it would be a more fair way to deal
with
things then my suggestion, and it doesn't violate the spirt of the
rules as original outlined (it's still a vote of ranked
preferences).
Are
you volunteering to do the vote counting Mike?
Sure thing.
I take it that there are no objections? If so, I'll call a vote by
the end
of the week.
+1
I just wish we had used this method with the community vote.
I guess as a committer I should try and figure out what order the
community would have voted and do that.
Yes -- I am only comfortable with a 'committer only' vote if it is
clear we are all operating to figure out what the first community vote
intended -- not to select our own preferences. (unless it is an
explicit veto)
ryan
