Glad you are sorted out! Michael Della Bitta
Senior Software Engineer o: +1 646 532 3062 appinions inc. “The Science of Influence Marketing” 18 East 41st Street New York, NY 10017 t: @appinions <https://twitter.com/Appinions> | g+: plus.google.com/appinions <https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/112002776285509593336/112002776285509593336/posts> w: appinions.com <http://www.appinions.com/> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Martin Wunderlich <martin...@gmx.net> wrote: > Thanks so much, Erick and Michael, for all the additional explanation. > The crucial information in the end turned out to be the one about the > Default Search Field („df“). In solrconfig.xml this parameter was to point > to the original text, which is why the expanded queries didn’t work. When I > set the df parameter to one of the fields with the expanded text, the > search works fine. I have also removed the copyField declarations. > > It’s all working as expected now. Thanks again for the help. > > Cheers, > > Martin > > > > > > Am 25.03.2015 um 23:43 schrieb Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>: > > > > Martin: > > Perhaps this would help > > > > indexed=true, stored=true > > field can be searched. The raw input (not analyzed in any way) can be > > shown to the user in the results list. > > > > indexed=true, stored=false > > field can be searched. However, the field can't be returned in the > > results list with the document. > > > > indexed=false, stored=true > > The field cannot be searched, but the contents can be returned in the > > results list with the document. There are some use-cases where this is > > desirable behavior. > > > > indexed=false, stored=false > > The entire field is thrown out, it's just as if you didn't send the > > field to be indexed at all. > > > > And one other thing, the copyField gets the _raw_ data not the > > analyzed data. Let's say you have two fields, "src" and "dst". > > copying from src to dest in schema.xml is identical to > > <add> > > <doc> > > <field name=src>original text</field> > > <field name=dst>original text</field> > > </doc> > > </add> > > > > that is, copyfield directives are not chained. > > > > Also, watch out for your query syntax. Michael's comments are spot-on, > > I'd just add this: > > > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/windex/select?q=Sprache&fq=original&wt=json&indent=true > > > > is kind of odd. Let's assume you mean "qf" rather than "fq". That > > _only_ matters if your query parser is "edismax", it'll be ignored in > > this case I believe. > > > > You'd want something like > > q=src:Sprache > > or > > q=dst:Sprache > > or even > > http://localhost:8983/solr/windex/select?q=Sprache&df=src > > http://localhost:8983/solr/windex/select?q=Sprache&df=dst > > > > where "df" is "default field" and the search is applied against that > > field in the absence of a field qualification like my first two > > examples. > > > > Best, > > Erick > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Michael Della Bitta > > <michael.della.bi...@appinions.com> wrote: > >> I agree the terminology is possibly a little confusing. > >> > >> Stored refers to values that are stored verbatim. You can retrieve them > >> verbatim. Analysis does not affect stored values. > >> Indexed values are tokenized/transformed and stored inverted. You can't > >> recover the literal analyzed version (at least, not easily). > >> > >> If what you really want is to store and retrieve case folded versions of > >> your data as well as the original, you need to use something like a > >> UpdateRequestProcessor, which I personally am less familiar with. > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Martin Wunderlich <martin...@gmx.net> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> So, the pre-processing steps are applied under <analyzer type=„index“>. > >>> And this point is not quite clear to me: Assuming that I have a simple > >>> case-folding step applied to the target of the copyField: How or where > are > >>> the lower-case tokens stored, if the text isn’t added to the index? > How is > >>> the query supposed to retrieve the lower-case version? > >>> (sorry, if this sounds like a naive question, but I have a feeling > that I > >>> am missing something really basic here). > >>> > >> > >> > >> Michael Della Bitta > >> > >> Senior Software Engineer > >> > >> o: +1 646 532 3062 > >> > >> appinions inc. > >> > >> “The Science of Influence Marketing” > >> > >> 18 East 41st Street > >> > >> New York, NY 10017 > >> > >> t: @appinions <https://twitter.com/Appinions> | g+: > >> plus.google.com/appinions > >> < > https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/112002776285509593336/112002776285509593336/posts > > > >> w: appinions.com <http://www.appinions.com/> > >
