Hmmmm. Could you expand a bit more on the problem you're trying
to solve? The index organization you're hinting at seems close enough
to a set of database tables to make me wonder if you're using an
inappropriate index structure given the problem you want to solve.

Not that I know enough about your problem/solution to have a valid
opinion, but there's at least a chance that this is an XY problem....

Best
Erick

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:52 PM, MilkDud <jf...@limewire.com> wrote:

>
> Yea, not using stopwords at all.  I do have tracks specified in the pf
> param
> along with a few other fields.  That said, with a phrase query I lose the
> ability to search for an artist and track combined.  Two solutions i've
> thought of include indexing at the track level only (right now i have
> separate documents at the track, artist, and album level) or having a field
> that contains both the artist and track name concatenated, allowing for
> phrase queries containing bother artist and track names.
>
>
> Michael Ludwig-4 wrote:
> >
> > MilkDud schrieb:
> >>
> >> That part I understand and is what I have now.  It's the fact that
> >> since tracks is multivalued, and i search for a track "love me", i
> >> will also get back artists that have the words love and me in separate
> >> tracks.
> >
> > Jason,
> >
> > are you sure "me" isn't in a stopword list used to analyze your query?
> > Append debugQuery=true to find out whether by any chance it is removed
> > from your query phrase. In that case, your phrase won't survive parsing,
> > and all you'll be left with is "love" :-)
> >
> > But I guess there are quite a lot of "love" titles :-)
> >
> >> Now with a phrase query with a small ps and a large posIncGap that
> >> could word.  But then I lose the ability to search for artist and
> >> track name together.
> >
> > Another thing, are you sure you have enabled "pf" for "track"?
> >
> > Michael Ludwig
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Searching-across-multivalued-fields-tp24056297p24076620.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to