Hi Michel, We are also facing same problem mentioned in the post (we are using dismaxrequesthandler)::
Ex: There is product title field in which --possible values 1) in unique key ID =1000 prdTitle_s field contains value "ladybird classic" 2) in unique key ID =1001 prdTitle_s field contains value "ladybird" When we are searching for --q=prdTitle_s:"ladybird"&qt=dismax , we are getting 2 results -- unique key ID =1000 and unique key ID =1001 Is it possible to just exact match which is nothing but unique key = 1001? Note: by default mm value is 100% per Solr documentation ~Vikrant Michael Ludwig-4 wrote: > > MilkDud schrieb: >> Ok, so lets suppose i did index across just the album. Using that >> index, how would I be able to handle searches of the form "artist name >> track name". > > What does the user interface look like? Do you have separate fields for > artists and tracks? Or just one field? > >> If i do the search using a phrase query, this won't match anything >> because the artist and track are not in one field (hence my idea of >> creating a third concatenated field). > > What do you expect the user to enter? > > * "dream theater innocence faded" - certainly wrong > * dream theater "innocence faded" - much better > > Use the DisMax query parser to read the query, as I suggested in my > first reply. You need to become more familiar with the various search > facilities, that will probably steer your ideas in more promising > directions. Read up about DisMax. > >> If i make it a non phrase query, itll return albums that have those >> words across all the tracks, which is not ideal. I.e. if you search >> for a track titled "love me" you will get back albums with the words >> love and me in different tracks. > > That doesn't make sense me to me. Did you inspect your query using > debugQuery=true as I suggested? What did it boil down to? > >> Basically, i'd like it to look at each track individually > > That tells me you're thinking database and table scan. > >> and if the artist + just one track match all the search terms, then >> that counts as a match. Does that make sense? If i index on the >> track level, that should work, but then i have to store album/artist >> info on each track. > > I think the following makes much more sense: > >>> An album should be a document and have the following fields (and >>> maybe more, if you have more data attached to it): >>> >>> id - unique, an identifier >>> title - album title >>> interpret - the musician, possibly multi-valued >>> track - every song or whatever, definitely multi-valued > > Read up about multi-valued fields (sample schema.xml, for example, or > Google) if you're unsure what this is; your posting subject, however, > suggests you aren't. > > Regards, > > Michael Ludwig > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Searching-across-multivalued-fields-tp24056297p24093897.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
