On Tue, 01 Dec 2009, Daniel Norton wrote: > What I'm seeing is that in a spam report, the attached copy of the > spam has a "Received" header line rewritten incorrectly, as shown > below. The rewritten line removes the "for" clause and the > semi-colon that followed it. The semi-colon is mandatory, per > RFC2821 (Sec. 4.4).
You've not included the entire header (missing a trailing ')'), and it's not rewritten, actually. spamass-milter cooks up a Received: header for sending to SA so that SA rules can trigger on the contents of it, but it's not complete, because at the time spamass-milter processses the mail, nothing has yet been accepted by the MTA. It probably could include the time and the semi-colon by modifying how the header is cooked up, but right now it doesn't. Don Armstrong -- "You know," said Arthur, "it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse, and about to die from asphyxiation in deep space that I really wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young." "Why, what did she tell you?" "I don't know, I didn't listen." –- Douglas Adams _The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy_ http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu _______________________________________________ Spamass-milt-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list
