On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 13:45 -0600, Daniel Norton wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Don Armstrong <[email protected]> > wrote: > You've not included the entire header (missing a trailing ')') > > > I copied it verbatim. > > , and > it's not rewritten, actually. > > spamass-milter cooks up a Received: header for sending to SA > so that > SA rules can trigger on the contents of it, but it's not > complete, > because at the time spamass-milter processses the mail, > nothing has > yet been accepted by the MTA. > > It probably could include the time and the semi-colon by > modifying how > the header is cooked up, but right now it doesn't. > > > It would be good to at least be RFC2821 compliant, don't you think? As it's not re-written: 3.8.2 Received Lines in Gatewaying
When forwarding a message into or out of the Internet environment, a gateway MUST prepend a Received: line, but it MUST NOT alter in any way a Received: line that is already in the header. Am I missing something? If you are unhappy, Daniel, you could ask for your money back under the Spamass-milter Guarantee ;-) Or modify the source yourself.... > > > -- > Daniel > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamass-milt-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list _______________________________________________ Spamass-milt-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list
