On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:10 -0600, Daniel Norton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Steve
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>         
>         Am I missing something?
> 
> 
> I guess I am. Who is writing this "Received" header line incorrectly?
> Is it not spamass-milter?
Is it *modifying* an existing header?
> 
> 
>         
>         If you are unhappy, Daniel, you could ask for your money back
>         under the Spamass-milter Guarantee ;-)
>         Or modify the source yourself....
> 
> 
> If this is a problem with spamass-milter, I don't mind fixing it and
> sharing the fix, but I guess I need to understand what's going on a
> little better and where the problem actually lies.
And possibly the wording of the RFC you quote *modify* -v- *create*

> _______________________________________________
> Spamass-milt-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list



_______________________________________________
Spamass-milt-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list

Reply via email to