On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Steve <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:10 -0600, Daniel Norton wrote: > > ...Who is writing this "Received" header line incorrectly? > > Is it not spamass-milter? > Is it *modifying* an existing header? > Who knows? > > I guess I need to understand what's going on a > > little better and where the problem actually lies. > And possibly the wording of the RFC you quote *modify* -v- *create* > RFC2821 doesn't indicate any distinction between modifying and creating a header. All I know is that: 1) When I don't use spamass-milter with spamd, and process it only using sendmail, all of the Received headers are compliant with RFC2821. 2) If I run spamassassin -Lt < mail.txt > out.txt, the output contains a spam report with an inserted message that has headers that are all compliant with RFC2821. 3) If I receive email using sendmail/spamasss-milter/spamd, I get a spam report with an attached email that contains a Received header line that is not compliant with RFC2821. Specifically, it is missing a required semi-colon before the time stamp. -- Daniel
_______________________________________________ Spamass-milt-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list
