On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 16:03 -0600, Daniel Norton wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Steve > <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:10 -0600, Daniel Norton wrote: > > ...Who is writing this "Received" header line incorrectly? > > Is it not spamass-milter? > > Is it *modifying* an existing header? > > > Who knows? > > > I guess I need to understand what's going on a > > little better and where the problem actually lies. > > And possibly the wording of the RFC you quote *modify* -v- > *create* > > > RFC2821 doesn't indicate any distinction between modifying and > creating a header. All I know is that: > 1) When I don't use spamass-milter with spamd, and process it only > using sendmail, all of the Received headers are compliant with > RFC2821. > 2) If I run spamassassin -Lt < mail.txt > out.txt, the output contains > a spam report with an inserted message that has headers that are all > compliant with RFC2821. > 3) If I receive email using sendmail/spamasss-milter/spamd, I get a > spam report with an attached email that contains a Received header > line that is not compliant with RFC2821. Specifically, it is missing a > required semi-colon before the time stamp. > > > -- > Daniel Daniel, Can you tell me where in RFC2821 it says that there should be a semi-colon before the time stamp? I've searched that document for the word semi-colon (no hits) and colon (1 hit) but nothing to support that. I'm curious where you are seeing that in 2821?
> _______________________________________________ Spamass-milt-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list
