http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3621





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-07-20 11:33 -------
Subject: Re:  add SpamCop reporting 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>> Reiterating Justin's comment, spamcop_reporting_address is more
>> descriptive than email_address and implies a relationship with
>> spamcop_submission_address.
>
>True, but there have been tests I've wanted to do that required the
>email_address in the past, so there's no reason to have multiple options
>for the same thing.  I think Justin's concerned is simply handled with
>some additional explanation.

I don't think it would be wise to use this email addr for any other
purpose.

It is no longer the case that users have a one-to-one correlation between
"addresses they receive mail at" and "addresses they send mail from".
plus-addressing, virtusertables, and the like have made that strictly
many-to-many.  I (for one) receive mail at hundreds of addresses, and
send using From addrs in the double digits.

In particular, spam-aware users are very likely to use a dedicated
plus-address for their spamcop reports, I would think.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFA/WVBQTcbUG5Y7woRAvtfAJ9v38j6UM9tLUuvG5J85Uif7m0EaACeIWQY
oYQvLFQsIL/A0Xq42/VeFWQ=
=D/Mm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Reply via email to