At 14:33 9/06/03 -0700, L. Walsh wrote:


        But this also misses the point -- mandatory filtering is *bad*.
I should be able to receive my email without it first going into a
possibly 2-3 hour back-logged queue waiting to be filtered before it is
sent to me.  My account alone can easily get 1000 emails a day.  Multiply
that by 100,000 users...maybe average .5 seconds extra time added per
email -- that's 2000 minutes of delay (divided by however many servers)
they have doing filtering -- and it isn't, of course, evenly spread throughout
the day, but bunches like traffic jams at various times of the day....
:-(.

Umm, and what makes you think that anyone running a spam filtering system is going to have a 2 to 3 hour backlog processing incomming messages ? Thats absolutely rediculous.


A 0.5 second delay scanning a message means exactly that - that your email will arrive 0.5 seconds later. No sooner, no later. How you figure that you have to multiply that by number of users they have I have no idea... :)

Regards,
Simon



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to