> Jack,
>
> based on what you wrote, I added a "-m 2" option to my call of spamd, to
> limit the number of children to 2.
> This should solve at least my problem, since the default obviously was
> "unlimited". If that's wrong, could one of the developers or someone with
> more insight set us straight?
>
> Thanks
> Ralf G.
What will happen when a process calls spamd, and it is at the max children
already? For instance, I have SA running server wide in a gateway
configuration with qmail as the MTA. It calls spamd each time it writes to
the queue, so sometimes there are quite a few spamd processes running,
hogging up the processor. If I limited this to say 5 processes by using "-m
5", what will happen to the 6th, 7th, etc. calls for spamd?
Thanks,
Chris
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.490 / Virus Database: 289 - Release Date: 6/16/2003
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
