On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 04:59:13AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote: > On Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 4:47:35 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > > Hi All > > > For the following spam why am I getting 2.3? This is my report > > > Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 5.0 required) > > > pts rule name description > > ---- ---------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------- > > 0.1 RATWR10_MESSID Message-ID has ratware pattern (HEXHEX.HEXHEX@) > > 1.7 SARE_RECV_IP_218079 Spam passed through possible spammer relay or > > source > > 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > > 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 50 to 56% > > [score: 0.5004] > > 0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts > > 0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML > > > I am using SA 2.63 with Rules_Du_Jour and I have spamcop_uri.cf in my > > /etc/mail/spamassassin dir. I did install it right. Could it be possible > > that my spamcop_uri is not working? > > bigpharmaworld.us is (only) in the ws.surbl.org list, but are you > using WS? The rule and score would look like this:
Yes, I am. And thats what I exactly suspected is that my spamcop_uri is not working. Not sure why. Is there a quick way to check where it is failing ? > > http://www.surbl.org/quickstart.html I did follow this instruction while installing surbl I installed the SpamCopURI plugin for SA 2.63, restarted spamd. I also have Net::DNS -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu There's no place like 127.0.0.1
