You know, the more I have to think about this the more it becomes apparent
that my request is a must have. Perhaps you can explain why anyone would
want to inform them selves or their own provider that you received a SPAM
and you suspect your self to be the sender of the SPAM. This tool provides
a list of possible receivers of a SPAM report. It goes through logic to
determine if the recipient should be pre-checked or not. It makes
absolutely no logical sense at all to pre-check me or my provider as a
recipient to notify them that I might be the sender of this SPAM. I am now
convinced that this should not be an option, it should be a mandatory part
of the application. It should never pre-check a recipient of a report that
is either my domain or my provider on behalf of my domain period. Unless
you all can give me a reasonable example of why anyone would want to do
that, I am offering my new proposal. I am no longer asking that this be
optional, I am asking that it be mandatory. The application should not
pre-check the recipient if it is one of my domains or one of my providers
because of one of my domains.
Paul Coleman
"dollface" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Paul Coleman wrote:
>
> >It appears you are and expert in doing this process. I must
> >admit I am not, and I hope I never have to become one. I need
> >every bit of assistance I can use. I have absolutely no idea
> >what "larting" is or means. I can tell you one thing for sure.
> > I resent being accused of "click-click-click and not pay
> >attention anymore". There is absolutely no truth in that
> >phrase. My suggestion still stands and in no way allows anyone
> >to go "click-click-click and not pay attention anymore" to
> >anything. I can't understand your resentment to my suggesting
> >safeguards to help prevent mistakes. I would simply like to be
> >able to have the option to not report to my Domian or any of
> >the providers up the chain on behave of my domian. That does
> >not give me or anyone else the abilty to go "click-click-click
> >and not pay attention anymore".
>
> While you may have noble intentions, there are always those users
> who will simply go click click click. To make such an option
> available to one would mean making it available to all...and that
> simply opens up too many Pandora's boxen.
>
> --
> SpamCop user, not the admin. Ideas expressed are my own.
> Please reply to group unless you have a specific issue with
> me. Spam will be promptly and happily thwhacked with my
> very largest mallet...
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
