Ole, I'm far from convinced that saying we stop - while the issue is a very big can of worms - is a good idea. Right now, there is a clear issue on the table here - and there are no proposals on how to address this - where addressing it would be either to remove the issue from the draft or propose something to update RFC8200 from my perspective. I fail to see how we can therefore think that closing this discussion to "some other unforeseen date" helps anyone - other than pushing the can down the road...
Andrew From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Ole Troan Sent: Thursday, 5 September 2019 22:30 To: Fernando Gont <fg...@si6networks.com> Cc: 6man WG <i...@ietf.org>; Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petre...@gmail.com>; Robert Raszuk <rras...@gmail.com>; spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law (was: Question about SRv6 Insert function) > On 5 Sep 2019, at 21:03, Fernando Gont > <fg...@si6networks.com<mailto:fg...@si6networks.com>> wrote: > > We have wasted way too much time and energy with all the methafores and > curious interpretations of standards by folks pushing and/or supporting > EH insertion, really. Pot calling kettle black? This is an issue we all know is there. And has to be resolved one way or the other. I am sure you will get ample opportunity to debate later. How this thread or discussing the topic on those terms adds value is beyond me. So I suggest we stop. Ole _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
