>> I don’t see a need to continue this debate on meta issues, but since you >> framed this as criticism of me in the chair role I found it required to >> reply. > > I expect the chair to uphold a previously reached consensus and put the > requirement of justifying deviating from it with the ones that want to go > against said consensus.
Proposals are judged on their merits. There is no protocol police. These proposals are not moving as far as I can see. So what are you trying to achieve by getting your collective knickers in a twist now? Ole _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
