>
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> >> Which means: 64 bits.
> >
> > Sorry but what is so magic about /64 here ?
>
> It is mandated by the current IPv6 addressing architecture.


Really ? Where ? I am looking at RFC4291 and nowhere I can find /64
reference.

Moreover sections 2.4 and 2.5 are very clear that there is no magic /64
hard defined.

The text actually goes even further and says:

   Except for the knowledge of the subnet boundary discussed in the
   previous paragraphs, nodes should not make any assumptions about the
   structure of an IPv6 address.


Thx,

R.





> Despite many discussions, there has never been consensus to change it. So
> if /64 is not the boundary between the routeable part and the host-specific
> part, it's not IPv6.
>
>    Brian
>
> >
> > Is this coming from the longest routable IPv6 prefix ? Sort of analogy
> to /24 in the IPv4 world ? Or something else ?
> >
> > I think LPM and CIDR techniques are pretty well established.
> >
> > Any fixed length of the address block with the meaning - do not use
> those bits inter or intra domain for anything useful even if your
> prefix+node can happily fit in /32 seems just dead wrong to me. And that is
> irrespective of any SRv6 discussion.
> >
> > In my books if I get allocated say /48 or /40 from RIR what I do with
> the remaining bits is my own business.
> >
> > Best,
> > R.
> >
> >
> >
> >     > Sorry, but it is a little bit late – RFC 8986 is already published.
> >
> >     "Locators are assigned consistent with IPv6 infrastructure
> allocation."
> >
> >     Which means: 64 bits.
> >
> >     I have no time to study compressed SIDs, but if they trample on the
> LOC they are not IPv6 addresses.
> >
> >        Brian
> >
> >
> >     --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> >     i...@ietf.org <mailto:i...@ietf.org>
> >     Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>
> >     --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to