Hi Nick, during review of RFC8986, section 3.2 was added. SID allocation follows that.
Darren On 2021-10-12, 10:40 AM, "Nick Hilliard" <n...@foobar.org> wrote: Darren Dukes (ddukes) wrote on 12/10/2021 15:35: > Given this, it is clear, the CSID flavors of the same SRv6 SIDs defined > in RFC8986 are also IPv6 addresses. Ok, this is good that we're all on the same page about SIDs being IPv6 addresses. This means that they and draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression need to comply with 8200 and 4291, and it looks to me like the draft does not. Nick
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
