I object to adoption on pretty much the same basis as what Tony wrote.
IPv6 isn't some game of Jenga where the object is to see how many
foundation blocks you can pull out before the whole thing collapses.
Separate to this, the WG adoption call for this draft violates two
sections of the spring charter (avoiding modification to existing data
planes and modification of data plane without reference to other WGs.
The 6man WG was not formally consulted about this and it probably ought
to have been.
Nick
Tony Przygienda wrote on 09/10/2021 16:49:
I object adoption of this document as well based on copious amount of
technical counter arguments laid out in multiple threads. Beside that it
seems that to violate IETF v6 architecture documents we seem to be
trampling on established standards more and more using increasingly
contorted sophisms (yes, you can hijack any address architecture if you
_assume_ that only /4 will be routing table entries & the rest belongs
to your new interpretation of address being a chipmunk that by magic
means will never ever escape a private basement until it does).
Beside that as others already pointed out copiously the document content
does not even seem to actually match WG consensus as recorded to my
understanding
--- tony
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:37 PM Ron Bonica
<rbonica=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org
<mailto:40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
Folks,____
__ __
Draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression-02 introduces three
new SID types that can occupy the Destination Address field of an
IPv6 header. See Sections 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 of the draft for
details.____
__ __
The SPRING WG has issued a call for adoption for this draft.____
__ __
It is not clear that these SID types can be harmonized with the IPv6
addressing architecture.____
__ __
Does anyone have an opinion?____
__ __
Ron____
__ __
Juniper Business Use Only
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
i...@ietf.org <mailto:i...@ietf.org>
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
i...@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
