The difference is in what you know at the time of the sale.  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George
Church
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: owners information certificate

I sell cars.
Family of 4 walks in, wants ot buy an F150 2 door, no backseat.
I throw them out on their ear since I KNOW they will be strapping the
baby
in the middle seat belt and there's no belt left for the 12 year old.

I feel so used. What if the husband had come in alone? I might have sold
them a means of breaking the law, albeit inadvertently.

I feel better now, their family is now safe.

glc

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Pinigis
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: owners information certificate

Don't fool yourself into believing that you can escape liability.  His
lawyers will claiming that you are the expert and you knew about their
future plans and still put in an inappropriate system.  Everything
changes after a loss.

Paul Pinigis

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
McGahan
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: owners information certificate

Part A:

 

What do we (as an industry) do when an owner completes the Owner's
Information Certificate incorrectly to deliberately mislead an AHJ? 

 

Part B:

 

What do we do when they technically tell the truth as in building a
warehouse that has no storage above 12' initially but they have every
intention (because they tell you so) to store PODS 24' high after they
get a
CO?

 

BTW, the reason I have been unsuccessful in convincing the owner of the
proper level of protection is because there have 2 of these buildings
built
within 200 miles in the last few months and both of them had minimal
systems. The installing contractor on one of the jobs told me that they
were
told the building was a spec warehouse and to protect it as an empty
building and after they were done the owner would lease it to the PODS
franchisee. His comment was "I don't know if that protects me or not"

 

Legally?

 

Morally I feel bound to walk away from this project but that just means
that
they will find someone else to do the job incorrectly and although there
is
no liability involved, there is still the knowledge that the building
(Ord.
Group II) will be grossly under protected.

 

I know the argument that we are not police of the industry nor can we
2nd
guess what the potential future occupancy of a building is or may be one
day, but this is different and one of the 2 scenarios listed above is
going
to happen on this project.

 

Thanks for your input,

Greg

 

Living Water Fire Protection, LLC

1160 McKenzie Road

Cantonment, FL 32533

850-937-1850

Fax: 850-937-1852

 

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to