If you look at the annex sections A.7.3.2.3 all the way through
A.7.10.1.2 (not necessarily inclusive), you can extrapolate to a great
degree the TC's earnest intent to direct the designer to the serving FD
for specific information about the type of equipment, response
procedures and location of hose connections.  I made a proposal
(rejected) and there was one other as I recall, that we move some of
some of that language into the body of the standard.  The consensus was
that it was too onerous and we actually discussed rural FD's and
townships that didn't have more than volunteer or shared fire brigades
as reasons why it may not be possible to query the AHJ as there is no
prevention bureau or other knowledgeable person that would have the
information.

A standpipe system is unique in that the end user is exclusively the FD.
Not the tenant or building owner, but the FD.   Whether it is a rural or
suburban or urban setting, there is no substitute for making an earnest
effort to tailor the specifics of the design to the needs and standard
practices of the end user. 

Steve Leyton
PROTECTION DESIGN & CONSULTING

My opinion only; not intended to represent any interpretation formal or
otherwise.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Duross
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 3:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Manual wet standpipes

Excellent point(s) Rich.
Reminds me to write that tia to the #14 committee on quantity of inlets.
It gets awfully hard to pump 1000 GPM through a 4" siamese.

In town, our's are almost always 4" LDH in 100' lengths and 2.5" out in
50'.

Should there also be a rural section in #14, Thom?

Tom Duross
Go Red Sox



Good information from Paul and Chris regarding fire apparatus pumps. If
you
really want to understand fire apparatus pumps and true FD capabilities,
you'll need to do that yourself and not solely rely on the FD.
Unfortunately, detailed knowledge of fire ground hydraulics,
particularly
with regard to pump hydraulics, is still rare in the fire service . Also
conservation of mass (or volume in fire service hydraulics to make it
simple) is often optional! As was stated, 1000-1500 gpm rated pumps are
probably most common, but 1750, 2000 gpm and larger are becoming more
common
place. The problem is that supply line size hasn't kept up. It is not
uncommon in traditional New England FDs to see a new 2000 gpm tower
ladder
with dual 1000 gpm master streams in a dept running with 3" supply line.
In
a forward lay, depending on supply line length and size, with lower
pressure
on the municipal side, supplying the rated volume of the pump might not
always be the case. Just because a department says it has pumpers are
rated
at x gpm, doesn't mean they have analyzed and can deliver that volume to
the
pumper (unless they have figured out how to beat conservation of mass
(volume more simply) and get 1500 gpm at the discharge side while
supplying
1000 gpm on the suction side.

If you wanted to be sure they can provide what they say they can, you
can't
leave out the supply lines and hose lines between the pumper and the
FDC.
Also, it raises a red flag to me when a dept. states they can provide
say
1500 gpm @ the FDC at even 150 psi. I always ask, how are you going to
supply that and what is your pump pressure to deliver that 1500 gpm @
150
psi to the FDC. Not many FDs run LDH to the FDC. They typically use 2
1/2"
or 3" and you are looking at losses in even a short length of a pair 2
1/2"
or 3" hose lines that is significant. Flow meters are not typical, so
the
pump operator doesn't know what he/she is flowing with a great deal of
accuracy. So if he/she is pumping at 150 psi and a significant volume,
you
probably have quite a bit less than 150 psi at FDC. They can throttle up
to
150 psi as the flow increases at the pumper, but again, if you're
flowing
significant volume, your less than that at the FDC. If you wanted to
provide
some margin for that, we should design for a FDC inlet pressure around
125
psi as standard without any additional info. That way whether the
apparatus
pump is at churn or more of a max flow, a 150 psi pump pressure is legit
and
your FDC pressure will vary between 150 and 125 psi or so (greater than
your
design pressure of 125 psi). If you truly want 150 or better at the FDC,
you
need to look at the friction loss between the pumper and the FDC,
because if
it is significant and it is not accounted for, a pump pressure of 150
psi
isn't going to deliver 150 psi at FDC (you'll get less than your design
pressure at the FDC). Some FDs will put a gauge at the standpipe
connection
and can communicate with the pump operator to increase/decrease pressure
as
required. Others don't and if you design for 150 psi at FDC and they
pump it
at that and no one (the designer or the pump operator) has accounted for
the
friction loss between the pumper and the FDC, the crew(s) on the hose
line(s) may be short on pressure and may experience the resulting poor
nozzle performance, etc.

For those that are interested, as was stated previously, fire apparatus
pumps are variable speed by varying the engine RPM. Also, most apparatus
pump manufacturers use the same case and often the same impeller for
multiple pump ratings with 750/1000/1250 rated pumps typically using the
same case/impeller and 1500/1750/2000 using another case/impeller. All
that
is varied is the pump RPM through changes in the pump transmission
gearing
(and ensuring the truck engine has sufficient HP to drive it after
losses
are accounted for).

Richard Malek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


First, for those of you who are not fire service types...you really need
to get up to speed on the fundamentals and the tactics if you are
designing what are manual firefighting components.  Talk to your local
FD's.  They would be more than happy to give everyone a couple of hour
"seminar" on the basic tactics and operations.  After all, you are
building stuff for them to use and they REALLY want/need it to work.

Fire apparatus pumps are variable pumps with the discharge volume and
pressure output being determined by the incident and the actions of the
firefighters/pump operator.  You can flow 100 gpm at 50 psi and then
jump to 1200 gpm @ 175 psi if you want by opening valves and adjusting
engine speed.  You can even get the pressure in the hose line to be
lower than the city pressure if you throttle your valves.

The point being that you cannot and should not treat apparatus pumps
like a normal fire pump.  There is a human in the way and you have to
account for him/her in your calcs....hence my very first comment above.

That said, as someone else stated earlier, it is fairly common for fire
departments to tie-in to a sprinkler and/or standpipe riser and pump at
150 psi and adjusting engine speed to maintain this until notified to do
something else.  This is used for two reasons.  First, 150 psi is some
pretty good water pressure and works very well for the majority of
sprinkler systems.  Second, from a standpipe point of view, 150 psi is
more often than not sufficient pressure to overcome elevation and
friction losses to the firefighters on the tip (nozzle). They can call
for adjustment at needed...and often do.  Fight the fire in the basement
and provide nothing less than 150 psi, when me and my crew get done
taking a beating from our own hoseline, I will come outside and use
whatever energy I have left to beat the pump operator into a bloody
pulp.  Conversely, if you are up to many floors firefighters can take a
beating from insufficient pressure too...hence the code requirements.

This is the reason you do the calculations...it prove whether your
design is capable of providing adequate pressure and volume with the
human factor in the system.  We (my engineering firm) always assume that
the water supply curve for a manual standpipe is 150 psi static, 150
residual, flowing the pumps rated capacity.  For most designs this is
ample...but you have to know what the pump capacity is (most today are
at least 1000 gpm...but not all).  If your demand is more than 1000 gpm,
you need to get the info from the fire department directly...do not
assume!

If it turns out that to provide adequate volume and pressure at the top
of the riser requires a tie-in pressure greater than 150 psi, make the
FD aware (in writing) and mark it on the standpipe connection so that
any responding pumper can read and knows what is needed.  You can not
assume that the first responding fire truck will the one closest or even
from the same town.

As for total water volume you have to meet the code requirements.  No
truck caries enough water.  You have to have adequate city water, a
tank, a pond, a river or a tanker (a "tender" to you west coasties)
shuttle or a combination of them to meet the volume demand.

I hope that helps.

Paul Sincaglia, P.E.
President, Firesafety Solutions, Inc.

And

Lt. Chagrin Falls Fire Department.




_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to