Yes, well Don Kaufman is very good at telling people no!!! I appreciate all this input and am passing it all on to the Big Cheez Kaufman.Gayle Knowles, SET > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected]> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:30:58 -0400> Subject: RE: Double-check vs RPs> > I believe Roland is on the AWWA committee to try to head off the backflow> Nazis at the root. Imagine when he gets done what he's doing and reads this,> he'll chime in with a better statement than "Just tell the water purveyor> NO!".> > glc> > -----Original Message-----> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 5:19 PM> To: [email protected]> Subject: Re: Double-check vs RPs> > One of those little extras we do without much fanfare. When Washington> first implemented backflow regulation through the Dept. of Health the> backflow folks started going crazy on retrofits wherever possible. The> hydraulic implications concerned me so I got involved and eventually> got a line into the administrative code to the effect that whenever a> retrofit was required to a sprinkler system consideration would be> given to the hydraulics. Although pretty weak it did open the eyes of> the water folks to the fact that their decision had life safety> implications beyond their own concerns. This started a dialogue and to> my knowledge these retrofits are usually negotiated when an issue> arises.> > >> > > _______________________________________________> Sprinklerforum mailing list> [email protected]> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum> > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
