Have they given a reason for this request? The RP is more effective so it would be hard to make that argument work.
Craig L. Prahl, CET Fire Protection Group Mechanical Department CH2MHILL Lockwood Greene 1500 International Drive PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 Direct - 864.599.4102 Fax - 864.599.8439 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lg.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GAYLE KNOWLES Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:20 PM To: sprinklerforum Subject: Double-check vs RPs We have a water purveyor that is wanting us to change out a double check bfp with a Reduced-pressure bfp. Does anyone have any information in defense of the double check being just as effective for backflow prevention? Maybe something from AWWA? Thanks, GK _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
