Yes - my ASSUMPTION was that we had adequate coverage by the pendent
sprinklers; and the sidewalls were in a relatively small pocket(s),
which seems logical if the pendants covered the floor below properly.
Given that scenario, I took the sidewall's purpose to be limited to:
providing sprinklers within 12 in. of the ceiling within the pockets (or
4 to 6 in. in this case), and reducing any delay in sprinkler
activation. 

If they are incapable of controlling the fire, no problem, the adjacent
pendent heads will do that; in a relatively small pocket, I would expect
the sidewall activation to quickly drive the heat plume outside the
pocket and activate the pendant heads.

Admittedly, this is all theoretical.  But what's the worst case
scenario?  How long could a fire grow before activating the pendent
sprinklers adjacent to the pockets? Again, these are relatively small
pockets whose floor areas are adequately covered by the Ex Haz pendent
sprinklers below.

Mark A. Sornsin, PE 
Fire Protection Engineer 
Ulteig Engineers, Inc. 
Fargo, ND  
701.280.8591
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cliff
Whitfield
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 2:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Extra Hazard Ceiling Pockets

Fellow forumites,

I guess I need to back up and expand my comments a little.  When I said
that
I agree with Mark, I was trying to say that if what Mark described in
his
comments about the head spacing (which none of us know for sure except
John)
was accurate, and the pendant heads indeed provided adequate coverage
for
the EH occupancy, then I believe that the sidewall heads should not
adversely affect the coverage for the room.

I had envisioned a fairly small room with 4 to 6 heads at the lower
ceiling
and the ceiling pocket being something like an 8 x 12 area above the
table.
(The problem is, since we don't have a "picture" of what John is
describing,
it could be a 3000 sf room with a small ceiling pocket).  If it is
similar
to what I envisioned, this seems like a case where 13 can't possibly
cover
ever known scenario and some sound engineering judgment needs to be
made.
(Which I can't actually do since I am not an engineer and don't play one
on
TV).  Maybe someone on the forum with a modeling program could get the
actual layout from John, run a model and let us know what the results
are. 

Cliff Whitfield, SET
Fire Design, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to