First, Unless FM's guidelines exceed NFPA I wouldn't be replacing the NFPA 
standard with the FM guidelines since NFPA is usually referenced in the 
building codes and FM's Data Sheets are not.  So if NFPA says do top and bottom 
and FM says only do bottom I'd be doing top and bottom.

Second, Conveyor system protection is found in more detail in NFPA 15 (7.2.3, 
2007) since these are almost always deluge type systems.  Definitely would not 
want to use closed heads in this application as the fire could out run the 
sprinklers or the sprinklers may not respond at all due to the belt movement.

A typical installation would consist of open spray nozzles usually with a broad 
angle spray pattern with linear heat detection or other heat detection method 
to set the system off. Manual activation is also a common accessory to the 
system.

Also it wasn't stated what was being conveyed.  There are other NFPA Standards 
for various industries or hazards which provide additional information on 
protection of conveyors in specific applications. 

With open nozzles such as Tyco's Protectospray or Reliable's Model A or 
Viking's Model E or other similar, you can select the discharge angle up to 180 
degrees,  the nozzle can be placed with a few feet of the object you are 
protecting with no loss of integrity of the spray pattern.  This is something 
you can not accomplish with a typical SSU or SSP.  They are not made for this 
type of application.  You must determine the appropriate spray angle as you 
determine the distance between the nozzle and the belt (axial distance).  As 
you get closer to the belt naturally the spray pattern area will get smaller.  
Also understand that you have various K-factors to choose from.  Choose the 
correct K-factor nozzle to deliver the needed amount of water to the hazard.  
You do not need to use just 5.6K's everywhere.  If this is an enclosed conveyor 
make sure the structural people as well as the conveyor mfgr. know about how 
much water you will be introducing into the enclosure so they can provide 
adequate drainage capabilities.  

Remember if you go below a certain size orifice (I think it's 3/8") you will 
have to provide a strainer on the system.  

Don't forget to discuss system interlocks for belt movement interruption with 
the conveyor vendor and owner.  

Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[email protected]
http://www.ch2m.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rod DiBona
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 6:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Sprinkler protection below conveyors in pits

We have used nozzles that can be selected with various spray patterns in this 
situation. Also something that we have recently discovered is that if this is 
an FM insured property they normally do not require the return belt to be 
covered even though NFPA is clear that it should be.
If not FM then we find a solution that most closely complies the standard and 
listing and present that to the powers to be. It is not always possible to 
comply 100%.

Rod DiBona
Rapid Fire

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ryan Hinson
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 3:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Sprinkler protection below conveyors in pits

Where would I go to properly protect below conveyors in pits that there is less 
then 4' of clear space below the return loop of the conveyor and the conveyer 
belt is 60" wide with SSU's?  NFPA 13(2002) section 8.6.5 does not address this 
situation in my opinion.  What is the space depth at which sprinklers are no 
longer able to develop the water pattern necessary to be practicable?

 

Thank you,

 

Ryan L. Hinson, EIT, CET, Nicet III

FP Design Manager

Fire Construction Design Services, LLC #C124

A Division of Fire Construction Services, Inc.

6950-43rd Avenue SE

St. Cloud, MN 56304

Direct:  320-250-5404 

Fax: 320-358-3495

email:   <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message, including 
any files transmitted within, is confidential, may be legally privileged, and 
is intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. The use of any 
confidential or personal information may be restricted by state and federal 
privacy laws.  If this message was received in error, please notify the sender 
and then delete this message.

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
[email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to