Ron, I am not a P.E. but just an underling in this industry who has been the victim of the dreaded (RJA) plan review rejection for no good reason letter.Sounds like this person thought he is the EOR and could bill for the resubmittal review. Just a thought.
Lamar Vaughn ---- "Fletcher wrote: > I would like the take from the PE's on forum on how to deal with a plan > review comment from an unnamed engineering firm (RJA). > > "Due to the higher than normal potential for a fire in the occupant > sleeping and common areas, the reduction in fire are (remote area) for > quick response sprinkler in accordance with NFPA #13 Figure 11.2.3.2.3.1 > is not a good engineering practice. Please revise the hydraulic > calculation to account for at least the minimum 1500 square foot design > area as specified by NFPA #13." > > The hazard is a dormitory at a minimum security prison. > > Ron Fletcher > Aero Automatic Sprinkler > Phoenix, AZ > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
