Excess pressure pumps served a purpose when risers had alarm valves with a 
pressure switch connected to the intermediate chamber.  With adjustable flow 
switches on the riser piping there should never be a need for these pumps 
anymore.

Garth
retired fitter

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: mercoid switch on wet riser


> Excess pressure pump. The definitive solution where someone in the range 
> of AHJ's takes stopping false alarms due to pressure surges. I do mean 
> stopping, not reducing. Required in Vancouver (and the rest of B.C.?). 
> Seems New Zealand is on the list.
>
> Can be done without the Gamewell (ADT?) unit. Not required to be listed 
> for fire protection service, unless unit also act as the switch for the 
> fire alarm system interface.
>
> Yours,
>
> Bruce Verhei
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tom Duross" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 7:51:04 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
> Subject: RE: mercoid switch on wet riser
>
> What Todd said. They probably replaced the original compound type with a
> mercury one.
>>From what I know, Gamewell isn't making them anymore. I think they ceased
> last summer, I drove out to get a diff. switch and they told me.
> Just as an aside, my grandfather is on the patent for this and a few other
> things Gamewell made before and after the depression when they were in
> Newton, MA. I have a beautiful one I "kept" in my basement along with a
> couple of those McCullough type switches I posted about last summer too in
> really nice shape.
> Of course, nothing official but my Dad has a picture of him and the crew
> taken in the shop after another patent was awarded. Funny coincidence. :)
>
> TD
> Go Red Sox!
>
> The old Gamewell excess pressure pumps had a very homemade look about 
> them.
> And that sounds like what is being described. Used to be required in 
> Canada
> and parts of Europe don't know if they still are..
>
> Richard
>
>
> Sounds like an excess pressure pump. These were used in areas with a
> lot of pressure fluctuations to prevent false alarms. This was before
> flow switches with delays. Gamewell was famous for these but
> Firematic made a fairly simple version of the same thing. Some towns
> (at least in this part of the world) required them
>
>
>
> At 11:38 AM 6/27/2009, you wrote:
>>I saw something which I do not understand and hope someone can explain
>>this to me.
>>A 35 year old wet system, manifold with 2 alarm valves. There is a
>>electric flow switch on each riser, I think added recently.
>>The valves were trimmed with the normal motor gongs, etc.
>>The system side gauges are piped together between the two risers, with
>>check valves, a mercoid switch labeled pump switch, and another mecoid
>>switch labeled alarm switch. On this piping there are 3 check valves
>>and a small test cock, presumably for testing.
>>There is a small pump with 1/2 in inlet from supply side of valve 2,
>>which discharges into the pressure gauge piping described above.
>>
>>What is the purpose of this? Was it standard at one time?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> 


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to