At one time, we serviced several restaurants with sprinkler protection in 
the Type I exhaust systems.  Common problems were duct penetrations that 
were not liquid/grease tight, no way to change the head, no fuel shut offs, 
no drains to test the fuel shut offs, and inadequate cleaning of the heads. 
I have seen grease balls around sprinkler heads,  chemical nozzles and 
fusible links.

We  have upgraded several restraints,  the last about 3 years ago.  The 
deviancies listed in this thread are the result of installers, inspectors, 
and service techs that did not know or care about the quality of their work.

I also still have a couple of the EA-1 heads.  I have not installed any for 
at least 20 years, but you never know. I recall the cost was about $100.00 
each.  I don't want to be known as a low-baller, so will only beat Ron's 
price by $5.00
--------------------------------------------------
From: "David de Vries" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 4:59 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Kitchen Hoods

> I will try and find the picture I have of the last installation I saw 
> protected by sprinklers.  The "sprinkler" in the exhaust duct was about 
> the size of a baseball - layer after layer of hardened grease.  It did not 
> operate during the fire, which took out a chunk of the roof to the tune of 
> ~$400K.
>
> And I am not suggesting that wet chem techs are any more, or less, 
> responsible than sprinkler contractors, just that these installations tend 
> to get overlooked.
>
> On the installation side, if you do go with sprinkler protection, be sure 
> someone puts in access panels so that you, or whoever is doing the work, 
> can clean or replace the sprinks when needed.  Oh, since 96 now requires 
> fusible links to be replaced every 6 months, you may want to consider 
> glass bulb sprinks, nice robust ones of the correct temp!
>
> Dave
>
> David A. de Vries, P.E., CSP
> Firetech Engineering Incorporated
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 5/3/10, Chris Cahill <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> From: Chris Cahill <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Kitchen Hoods
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, May 3, 2010, 4:47 PM
>
>
> I now regret bringing the fryer into this. It's interesting how this forum
> will pick a piece of a thread and run that way.  Just an observation, I
> assume it related to the written form where we lose a great deal of
> communication.  IT IS THE BEST PLACE ON THE NET OF ITS KIND IMHO.
>
> I did say originally there was/is NO FRYER.  I probably should have
> emphasized that in the first sentence not buried in the second paragraph.
> This is an existing school.  Haven't had a fryer in 20 years they say.
> Could they in the future, sure.  But fried food is bad for you in case you
> didn't know.  WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN! Oh and the existing hood has had
> nothing in it forever.
>
> Some how we think the ITM guy for the wet chem is better than our 
> industry?
> Why would one think that?  I'm sure they have their share of low bid guys
> just like us and who do you think a school would use even if they did ITM?
>
> Oh and I have 16 brand new EA-1's from 1996 about 8' from my seat.  For 
> the
> last 5 years they have been stored in a climate controlled office in a 
> safe,
> yes I'm serious. But again no fryer, no EA-1, no problem, well sort of.
>
> I do appreciate the comments thus far which supports my thinking this is a
> bad idea.  But my real question was more curiosity about any actually 
> doing
> non-fryer cooking hoods with sprinklers these days. Trying to convince the
> PE is the task at hand.  Before I pushed too hard I didn't want to get
> caught with "well in the other 49 states this is routine".
>
> And Dave, they don't come in 1" that I could find. But I guess I could put 
> 2
> -  1/2" together in parallel to get to the 1" needed, lol.
>
> Chris Cahill, P.E.
> Fire Protection Engineer
> Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
>
> 763-658-4483
> 763-658-4921 fax
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
> Mail: P.O. Box 69
>         Waverly, MN 55390
>
> Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
>               Waverly, MN 55390
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to