Perhaps you could use this and run a quick calc? I can't imagine a 3" isn't 
adaquite for 5 heads??? 13,2007

11.2.3.3.6 Where the room design method is used and the area
under consideration is a corridor protected by a single row of
sprinklers with protected openings in accordance with 11.2.3.3.5,
the maximum number of sprinklers that needs to be calculated is
five or when extended coverage sprinklers are installed, all sprinklers
contained within 75 linear feet (22.9 linear meters) of corridor.
11.2.3.3.7 Where the area under consideration is a corridor
protected by a single row of sprinklers with unprotected openings,
in a light hazard occupancy, the design area shall include
all sprinklers in the corridor to a maximum of five, or when
extended coverage sprinklers are installed, all sprinklers
within 75 linear feet (22.9 linear meters) of the corridor.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Hicks
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Hydraulic Calcs

The dry pipe protects the overhang of a walkway, no attic.  the original 
install is about 20 years old.  About 6 years ago, 2 more low hazard 
buildings were built and the dry pipe system was extended.  The 2 new 
buildings are each protected by  a separate wet system.  All the fire water 
comes from the original street connection. The extension increased the 
protected area about 35-40 %.  I assume hydraulic Calcs were done by a 
licensed person. I tried to type that with a straight face.  No increase in 
pipe sizes were done.  I do not know what edition of 13 was used for any of 
the sprinkler work.   I doubt that any water supply information is on file 
anyplace.  So if Calcs are needed, I will have to have a qualified person do 
that for me.  My local AHJ allows do whatever I want.   So the decision will 
be up to the client and his engineer.

I will print this out, we have a meeting at 9:00 AM.   After the meeting I 
am sure I will have more questions.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Todd Williams
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 4:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Hydraulic Calcs

Are you replacing only the 3" pipe or branch
lines and heads as well? Was the existing system
hydraulically calculated or pipe schedule? How old is the system?

Depending on the age of the existing system, new
hydraulics could open cans of worms. If it is
pipe schedule, the system has probably never been
calculated so there is no indication of how the
hydraulics looked in the first place. If it has
been calculated, was the 30% increase for dry
systems, 30% increase for roof slope and the
new(er) minimum end head pressures included? If
not, you may not have an adequate system, based
on current Code. But it may have been fine when
it was installed. Is there a compelling reason to
bring this attic up to current Code?

This probably needs to be hashed out between you,
the Owner, Engineer and AHJ. I hope your quote
included a provision so you get extra $$ if the
pipe sizes increase due to the hydraulics.


At 02:10 AM 1/12/2011, you wrote:
>I am bidding on removal and replacement of an existing dry pipe system. 
>This is about 1,000 feet of 3 inch. Part of the specification is 
>“Contractor shall submit working plans that have been approved by 
>authorities having jurisdiction, including hydraulic calculations, prior to 
>starting work.” Is it normal to have new calculations done when just 
>replacing rusting pipes?  If so, where do you draw the line at needing new 
>calculations?  There has been  new construction,  since the building was 
>built.  Three new low hazard buildings have been built, with a  new low 
>hazard rehabilitation facility going in a block down the street. 
>_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list 
>[email protected] 
>http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For 
>Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To 
>Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put 
>the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to