Rolling Aisle File Storage presents a severe fire load for the sprinkler system 
to suppress. There were studies conducted by:

        1. Fire Protection Study, Mobile Compact Shelving Fire Tests, “Archives 
II”, Gage-Babcock & Associates, Dated June 1990.

        2. Full Scale Fire Tests of Sprinklered Mobile Shelving Units for 
National Library of Canada, Gage-Babcock & Associates, Dated May 1992.

        3. Full-Scale Fire Tests and the Development of Design Criteria for 
Sprinkler Protection of Mobile Shelving Units, G.D. Lougheed, J.R. Mawhinney, 
and J. O’Neill, Fire Technology, First Quarter 1994, Volume 30, Number 1, 
pp.’s. 98 - 133.


Fire testing involving archival records stored in mobile compact shelving 
indicated that sprinklers were not able to prevent extensive damage to records. 
 An analysis of those fire tests indicated that standard 212F temperature 
rated sprinklers did not operate until the fire was well underway, particularly 
in the lower levels of the units.  Once the sprinklers operated, the water 
spray could not effectively reach and control the fire.  The close proximity of 
the rows of stack units combined with typical unit depth prevented the water 
discharge from the overhead sprinklers from wetting the records and containers 
stored in the units, and to effectively control and extinguish the fire.

Additional fire testing for the General Services Administration (GSA) entitled 
“Archives II” has verified that quick-response (QR) sprinklers along with 
enhancements in the operation and construction features in the stack units 
greatly limited the fire damage to archival records as compared to previous 
methods of fire protection.  The concept included a modification of the 
controls for electric motor-driven unit, whereby in the early stages of a fire 
following activation of a smoke detector, the rows automatically shift to a 
uniform 4 to 5 inches spacing between each adjacent row in a stack area.  The 
verification fire tests indicated that with QR sprinklers effective fire 
control was achieved with damage primarily limited to two rows exposed to the 
incipient fire.

The first concept is not necessarily limited to electric motor-driven stack 
systems. This concept can be applied to mechanical assist systems when based on 
having at all times a minimum 6-inch space between the mechanical shelving 
units. This will necessitate the removal of one, or more as required, moving 
shelf storage unit on each side of the fixed center shelf unit and the 
installation of a “bumper” to maintain a minimum 6-inch space between the 
shelving units at all times. 

It was clear from the results of Archives II, Test No. 2 that close proximity 
of the adjacent rows of stacks presented the same problems for effective fire 
control as in the Factory Mutual (FM) tests conducted on 1978 on Rolling Aisle 
Storage Arrangements.  The benefit of the QR sprinkler over the standard 
sprinklers was evident in that the fire did not “jump” or spread across the 
access aisle before or after sprinkler activation.  In the previous FM tests, 
the fire spread across the access aisle before the first standard sprinkler 
actuated.

Since the sprinkler spray did not reach the fire burning below in the lower 
levels of the stack units, simply increasing the water flow rate from the 
sprinklers would not likely result in better extinguishment. 

The sprinkler system used in the Archives II test was designed to provide a 
water flow rate of 30 gpm/sprinkler.  This resulted in an average system design 
density of 0.30 gpm/ft2.  It is important to recognize that use of the Archives 
II recommendations necessitates verification that the existing sprinkler system 
can deliver the design densities used in the tests of vertical stacks.

The hydraulic calculations should be based on a design density of 0.30 gpm over 
the hydraulically remote 3,000-sq. ft. using QR sprinkler heads.

In addition to the sprinkler system modifications the storage shelving 
arrangement will need to be modified as follows:

1.      One or more of the rolling shelving unit(s) will need to be removed on 
either side of the center non-moveable shelving section. This applies to all of 
the shelving units arrays.
2.      Provide a mechanical means to maintain at all times a minimum 6-inch 
space between each shelving unit. 
3.      The compartment containing the rolling aisle storage shall be cut off 
from the remainder of the facility with two hour fire rated barrier (ceiling, 
floor and walls), with openings protected by 1½ hour, Class B, fire rated 
protective devices..

This is not just a sprinkler contractor solution. 

Hope this helps.

Have a fire safe day!

Jim Davidson 
 
Davidson Associates 
Fire Protection • Medical Gas • Code Consulting  
302-994-9500   Fax:302-234-1781


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew J. Willis
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Rolling medical file storage

I am surprised it is not a deluge....

If they were put in since last inspection, Yes code violation. (4.1.6)

If built that way, No. (1.1.2)



R/
Matt

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
[email protected]

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [email protected] [mailto:sprinklerforum-
> >[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gregg Key
> >Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:27 PM
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Rolling medical file storage
> >
> >It has been a while since I have been on and I think this has been
> >discussed
> >before but cant find it in the archives so here I go.
> >
> >Doing a NFPA 25 inspection and find a medical storage room with rolling
> >files that are within 8" of the sprinklers. Sprinklers spaced 12x12. This
> >system has 8 rolling files and only room for 1 to be open at a time so no
> >way to get adequate coverage.  Was told it was installed like this from
> >beginning and was accepted. What sayest the Sprinkler forumites? code
> >violation or not? How would you address it? BTW this is at a State
> >facility.
> >Thanks
> >
> >C.Gregg Key, SET
> >Key Fire Protection Services,Inc
> >Project Manager
> >(O) 706-790-3473
> >(C) 706-220-8821
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> >
> >For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> >
> >To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> >
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3375 - Release Date: 01/19/11
> >13:34:00

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to