Yes, but every time a piece of pipe is changed the computer recalculates a new 
end head pressure. It's kind of like playing whack-a-mole. Guess I prefer the 
old way to make sure.


Ron Fletcher
Aero Automatic
Phoenix, AZ

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Trevor Spain
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Balancing Rack Calc's

I haven't used every hydraulic calculation program on the market but I 
assume all of them will let a designer examine Pt and q for every head. 
Assuming a designer knows what they've typed in, detecting a large 
imbalance should be easy to detect from examining this information and 
reported system demand flow. I certainly can see a lazy designer failing 
to do this, though ... after all, the computer is infallible, right?

Trevor Spain
Igneus Incorporated


On 4/20/2011 10:23 AM, Ronl.Fletcher wrote:
> Yes but when the computer hashes it out you can't tell how much of an 
> imbalance you have. The computer adjusts the end head pressure so things 
> balance at the connection causing overflow in one system or the other, unless 
> you get really lucky. I would always calc each system, make sure they balance 
> at the connection then let the computer hash it out. I've seen rack systems 
> that require 420 gpm minimum use over 600 gpm and the designer says "well 
> it's balanced at the base of riser".
>
> Ron Fletcher
> Aero Automatic
> Phoenix, AZ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Grise
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:33 AM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: Balancing Rack Calc's
>
> Brian,
>
> I have seen that it matters which has the higher pressure for exactly the 
> reason you are describing (when adding racks to an overhead system). If one 
> requires too high a pressure, it may overflow the other enough to blow the 
> calc.
>
> I agree with the others though... if you can, just build the entire system 
> into one model and let the computer hash it out.
>
> Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP
> Sales Engineer
> Alliance Fire Protection
> 130 w 9th Ave.
> North Kansas City, MO 64116
>
> *Licensed in KS&  MO
>
> 913.888.0647 ph
> 913.888.0618 f
> 913.927.0222 cell
> www. AFPsprink.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 9:25 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Balancing Rack Calc's
>
> Brian,
>
> If this is a new system with roof&  rack systems,then calc them as 1
> system,adjust pipe size to give the required demand at each area and no
> other balancing is needed.It's when you are adding a rack system to an
> existing roof system riser that balancing is required.I was told by F.M.
> years ago that if the 2 systems were within 1 PSI of each other,they
> would not ask for a seperate balancing calc.Good luck.
>
> Lamar Vaughn,SET
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Brian Harris wrote:
>
>> Travis-
>> I'm using HydraCalc
>>
>> Brian Harris
>> FDFP Inc.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Travis
>> Mack,
>> SET
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:10 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Balancing Rack Calc's
>>
>> What calc program are you using? Just put both the rack and overhead
>> system
>> in the calc file and let the computer balance.
>> It has been over a decade since I did a 'separate' calc for each.
>> Travis Mack, SET
>> MFP Design, LLC
>> www.mfpdesign.com
>>
>> Sent on the SprintR Now Network from my BlackBerryR
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Brian Harris"<[email protected]>
>> Sender: [email protected]: Wed, 20 Apr 2011
>> 10:06:42 To:<[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Balancing Rack Calc's
>>
>> I knew sooner or later my luck would run out and I'd have a job with
>> racks,
>> yes ladies and gentlemen this is the first time I've had to do an in
>> rack
>> system. I've searched through code, searched past archives, and still
>> am not
>> all warm and fuzzy with my conclusion, if someone would be so kind as
>> to
>> either give me either an amen or send me to the corner with a dunce
>> cap I
>> would greatly appreciate it.
>>
>>
>> I have done my overhead calc's, done my rack calc's, they are balanced
>> to
>> within .5 psi of each other at a common point on the riser. My
>> question is
>> this: does it matter which calc has the higher of the two pressures?
>> The
>> reason I ask is when it comes to the combined calc and you balance the
>> flow
>> at the common point on the riser I have tried two scenarios, if the
>> higher
>> pressure is on the rack system and you plug in the "balance" formula I
>> get
>> 981 gallons I need to add to the rack system which will work. If I
>> tweak a
>> couple things and the overhead system is the higher pressure and plug
>> that
>> into the "balance" formula I get 181 gallons that I need to add to the
>> overhead system and that will not work. What is the consensus of the
>> forum?
>>
>>
>> Brian Harris
>>
>> First Defense Fire Protection
>>
>> 11957 Ramah Church Road
>>
>> Huntersville, NC 28078
>>
>> Phone: 704.948.3506
>>
>> Fax: 704.948.3507
>>
>> Nicet # 128476
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> =======
>> Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
>> (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17320)
>> http://www.pctools.com/
>> =======
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>
>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>
>> To Unsubscribe, send an email
>> to:[email protected]
>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>
>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>
>> To Unsubscribe, send an email
>> to:[email protected]
>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> =======
>> Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
>> (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17320)
>> http://www.pctools.com/
>> =======
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> =======
>> Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
>> (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17320)
>> http://www.pctools.com/
>> =======
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>
>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>
>> To Unsubscribe, send an email
>> to:[email protected]
>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to