What we have is High temp heads installed in an ordinary hazard occupancy. I believe 8.3.2.3 does explicitly allow this. The inspector has a different opinion. My position is 8.3.2.3 doesn't leave room for opinions, and wasn't intended to! Mark at Aero
----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Verhei [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 12:47 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Sprinkler head Temperature requirement Mark My understanding of this is to ensure that ordinary temp heads are replaced with at least intermediate heads are installed to prevent head operation in absence of a fire. Bv Sent from my Motorola ATRIX™ 4G on AT&T -----Original message----- From: Roland Huggins <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, Sep 28, 2012 22:40:08 GMT+00:00 Subject: Re: Sprinkler head Temperature requirement as Todd already said, it is explicitly allowed by 8.3.2.3 unless the AHJ is trying to call it a light hazard occupancy. Roland On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:00 AM, <[email protected]> <[email protected] > wrote: > I have a Friday question for the forum, and maybe Roland is able to > respond > with some "intent" perspective. In a 27' high industrial > spec building, we > installed sprinkler heads rated at 286 degree. > This was permitted, > installed, inspected and approved. The owner now > has a tenant lease which > will build out the entire building as a > retail furniture showroom, no > ceiling and no storage. The local fire > inspector is siting NFPA 2002 > Edition section 8.3.2.2, "Where > maximum ceiling temperatures exceed 100 > degrees F, sprinklers with > temperature ratings in accordance with the > maximum ceiling > temperatures of Table 6.2.5.1 shall be used." , as a > requirement to > remove all the sprinklers in the building and replace them > with 212 > degree F sprinklers. My contention is that the next section, > > 8.3.2.3 "High temperature sprinklers shall be permitted to be used > > throughout ordinary and extra hazard occupancies and as allowed in > this > standard and other NFPA codes and standards.", allows the > existing 286 > degree sprinklers to remain and be in compliance with > NFPA 13. What say the > professionals, Roland, Steve, George, Ron, > Rod, Anyone .....? > Mark at Aero > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120928/c513f5a8/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
