I can't believe I'm asking this question after all these years.  Anyway, 
swallowing pride and asking.

2010 NFPA 13 strict Density/Area method 11.2.3.2 and 22.4.4.1.1.  Great big 
room being subdivided. Existing system with a new wall added between heads on a 
BL.  Contractor had to add a head on one side to preserve the existing spacing 
(area) of the heads.  Without head over 130 sq.ft.  I take the 1.2 ^.5 of the 
area and get 46.5' required along the BL.  Original system lets say calc'd 5 
heads on the BL.  But now in the same 46.5' there are 6 heads on the BL.  Do I 
ignore the wall and require a new calc?  What if the wall is rated 1 hour do I 
ignore it?

I looked all over and can't seem to find anything definitive. Room design is 
out so not a consideration.  22.4.4.1.1.1 simply says all the heads in the 
46.5'.  I can't find anything that says either to count the wall as a break so 
measure 46.5' from the wall in each direction and still see if there are 5 head 
or ignore it and there are now 6 heads.  I find 11.1.2 that clarifies to extend 
the density or not.  I don't think that's applicable exactly. The question is 
not about whether to extend the density on either side. Let's just say it's all 
OH.

It gets a little more complex as on the one side of the wall they cut a head in 
on the BL but on the other side there is a perpendicular new wall and they come 
off same BL and arm over to two more head so if I ignore the walls there are 
now 8 heads off the 1 BL.

Prefer a code section or written reference 'cuz this is going to be a big deal 
if we ignore the walls.  Ordinarily with unrated walls they are ignored in 
density/area (of course can't find that reference).  I think I'm getting 
tripped up with the rated portion? Or maybe I'm just tired????

Chris Cahill, PE*
Associate Fire Protection Engineer
Burns & McDonnell
Phone:  952.656.3652
Fax:  952.229.2923
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.burnsmcd.com<http://www.burnsmcd.com/>
*Registered in: MN


Proud to be #14 on FORTUNE's 2014 List of 100 Best Companies to Work For




_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to