Good water or bad?
> On May 20, 2014, at 7:12 PM, "Cahill, Christopher" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I can't believe I'm asking this question after all these years. Anyway, > swallowing pride and asking. > > 2010 NFPA 13 strict Density/Area method 11.2.3.2 and 22.4.4.1.1. Great big > room being subdivided. Existing system with a new wall added between heads on > a BL. Contractor had to add a head on one side to preserve the existing > spacing (area) of the heads. Without head over 130 sq.ft. I take the 1.2 > ^.5 of the area and get 46.5' required along the BL. Original system lets > say calc'd 5 heads on the BL. But now in the same 46.5' there are 6 heads on > the BL. Do I ignore the wall and require a new calc? What if the wall is > rated 1 hour do I ignore it? > > I looked all over and can't seem to find anything definitive. Room design is > out so not a consideration. 22.4.4.1.1.1 simply says all the heads in the > 46.5'. I can't find anything that says either to count the wall as a break > so measure 46.5' from the wall in each direction and still see if there are 5 > head or ignore it and there are now 6 heads. I find 11.1.2 that clarifies to > extend the density or not. I don't think that's applicable exactly. The > question is not about whether to extend the density on either side. Let's > just say it's all OH. > > It gets a little more complex as on the one side of the wall they cut a head > in on the BL but on the other side there is a perpendicular new wall and they > come off same BL and arm over to two more head so if I ignore the walls there > are now 8 heads off the 1 BL. > > Prefer a code section or written reference 'cuz this is going to be a big > deal if we ignore the walls. Ordinarily with unrated walls they are ignored > in density/area (of course can't find that reference). I think I'm getting > tripped up with the rated portion? Or maybe I'm just tired???? > > Chris Cahill, PE* > Associate Fire Protection Engineer > Burns & McDonnell > Phone: 952.656.3652 > Fax: 952.229.2923 > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > www.burnsmcd.com<http://www.burnsmcd.com/> > *Registered in: MN > > > Proud to be #14 on FORTUNE's 2014 List of 100 Best Companies to Work For > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
