Again, in WA State, the Level U does all the underground tests and cert, although the sprinkler cert includes authority to do this work. Only a couple contractors in Puget Sound do the underground as a normal part of their scope of work.
Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 29, 2016, at 21:17, Steve Leyton <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's pretty much the issue now isn't it? In most of the jurisdictions where > we work, if the work is divided as we are discussing, then to hydrostatic > test and two flushes are required. The problem for the owner is when a leak > occurs or some sort of inspection card goes missing, and then you have two > different contractors pointing their fingers at each other. > > > Steve > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Scott Futrell <[email protected]> > Date: 3/29/2016 7:15 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: UG 5 ft outside building > > Who flushes all of it in accordance with 13 & 24? Who accepts the liability > for all of it? > > Scott > > Office: (763) 425-1001 x 202 > Cell: (612) 759-5556 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Bruce Verhei > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 7:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: UG 5 ft outside building > > In Puget Sound I've seen sprinkler (overhead) contractor providing a brand > name stainless product that extends a couple feet outside footing, that the > underground contractor installs as part of their work. > > Best > > Bruce Verhei > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
