This sounds good to me.  I have sent in for an AFSA informal interp just to get 
a bit more ammo.

 

This project has both 13R and 13 buildings on it.  So, the 13 buildings, I will 
definitely have to go steel, but I’m going to try to get all of the 13R 
buildings as CPVC.

 



Travis Mack, SET

MFP Design, LLC

3356 E Vallejo Ct

Gilbert, AZ 85298

480-505-9271

fax: 866-430-6107

 <mailto:email:[email protected]> email:[email protected]

 

 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mfpdesign.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=HJ8OA4xyeHAoxXNz5mu%2FYfycgtd5nsFrrpvzulZiNkQ%3D&reserved=0>
 http://www.mfpdesign.com

 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FMFP-Design-LLC%2F92218417692&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=H%2BwdcgK8DLGBcNoqJEvUrzsXngySwkX56Vgf9gM9EGk%3D&reserved=0>
 https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

Send large files to us via:  
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hightail.com%2Fu%2FMFPDesign&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=eGdMZGu2wXhUupGwgGTrqF3b54OP5%2BAZvlHhABSexWY%3D&reserved=0>
 https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign 

LinkedIn:  
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Ftravismack&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=tT5E7LsZjSmyreKi4gDCa70EWN%2BZodi%2FhbeCbHNRijI%3D&reserved=0>
 https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack

 

“The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price 
is forgotten.”

 

From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Fire Design
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 10:51 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: NFPA 13R - Garages - CPVC

 

I would agree with CPVC because of the  manufacturer listing. However, if you 
were using a manufacturer that did not have that verbiage and you were back to 
your interpretation of 13R I think you are wrong in applying the aggregate for 
the 400 sq. ft. rule. 13R specifically calls out "rooms" and not 'areas'. I 
personally think it's completely within the scope of 13R to have a 300 sq. ft. 
storage room next to a 150 sq. ft. mop closet and be able to use CPVC to feed 
each room because individually they're less than 400 sq. ft. Now, perhaps in 
the rare event you have a large run of such rooms next to each other it may be 
better to have your line out in the corridor or something and poke a head into 
each room in lieu of running the line directly over the run of OH rooms but 
that is still just a matter of preference in my opinion. I think the main thing 
to be concerned about is being able to provide the correct water density since 
the piping above is not going to be compromised if the sprinkler activates and 
controls the fire when it should.

 

 


 
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
 

Virus-free.  
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
 www.avast.com 

 

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Bob <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Travis,

Based on the product listing, CPVC is appropriate.

 

Thank you,

 

Bob Knight, CET III

208-318-3057

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of MFP 
Design, LLC
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2018 9:57 AM
To: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: NFPA 13R - Garages - CPVC

 

Good morning forum members.  I would like to get your take on the concept below.

 

We have a building that meets all criteria to be protected per NFPA 13R (2013 
edition).  These buildings have garages and dwelling units on the lower floor 
separated from the dwelling units by a common corridor.  As such, these garages 
are not a separate building, but are accessible by more than one dwelling unit. 
 This requires designing the garages per 7.2 – Areas outside the dwelling unit.

 

Since garages are typically OH1, it is the intent to calculate these spaces 
with a density of 0.15.  The spaces are ≤ 500 sq ft, so 7.2.2.1 allows us to 
limit the number of calculated sprinklers to all in a compartment to a maximum 
of 4.  We are using QR sprinklers in these garages.

 

Now, here is where the wrinkle comes.  Are we permitted to use CPVC above the 
ceiling in these areas?  The ceiling is double layered gyp board.  NFPA 13R 
5.2.2.2 states pipe or tube listed for light hazard shall be permitted where 
the room does not exceed 400 sq ft.  I was always informed that you must 
consider the aggregate area for determining this 400 sq ft.  Some of these 
garages are just over 400 sq ft.  Others are ±300 sq ft.  However, there are 
multiple garages side by side, so the aggregate is well over 400 sq ft.  In 
this section, I would state that CPVC would not be an option above the garages.

 

But, the listing of CPVC has a section for garages.  It states that CPVC is 
permitted provided that:

*       Minimum protection of 3/8” gypsum
*       Listed sprinklers ≤225°F utilized
*       System shall be installed per NFPA 13R
*       CPVC pipe / fittings to be installed per manufacturer’s criteria.

 

I am proposing that the piping be steel due to 5.2.2.2 but the builder is 
wanting CPVC and is stating it is possible by the CPVC listing noted above.  
The issue is that we have floor joists closely spaced and you can’t get steel 
going perpendicular to the floor joists up in the floor joist space.  So, the 
builder will have to build a soffit where we run perpendicular to the floor 
joists.  We can be up in the joist space running parallel.

 

So, CPVC or steel?  What is the forum consensus?

 



Travis Mack, SET

MFP Design, LLC

3356 E Vallejo Ct

Gilbert, AZ 85298

480-505-9271

fax: 866-430-6107

 <mailto:email:[email protected]> email:[email protected]

 

 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mfpdesign.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=HJ8OA4xyeHAoxXNz5mu%2FYfycgtd5nsFrrpvzulZiNkQ%3D&reserved=0>
 http://www.mfpdesign.com

 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FMFP-Design-LLC%2F92218417692&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=H%2BwdcgK8DLGBcNoqJEvUrzsXngySwkX56Vgf9gM9EGk%3D&reserved=0>
 https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

Send large files to us via:  
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hightail.com%2Fu%2FMFPDesign&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=eGdMZGu2wXhUupGwgGTrqF3b54OP5%2BAZvlHhABSexWY%3D&reserved=0>
 https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign 

LinkedIn:  
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Ftravismack&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=tT5E7LsZjSmyreKi4gDCa70EWN%2BZodi%2FhbeCbHNRijI%3D&reserved=0>
 https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack

 

“The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price 
is forgotten.”

 


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to