If you want to access your accounts over the internet, why wouldn't you run SQL-Ledger under https?
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:16:44 +0800, you wrote: >On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 01:08, Elizabeth Ziph wrote: >> [monk] omits to mention: sql-ledger works, correctly. Code is >> reasonably structured. This code review omits to measure the value the >> code delivers. Safety concerns can be addressed by running on a secure >> Intranet. > >I don't buy the Monks point, but I don't buy yours either. People want to (and >do) access their accounts over the Internet. > >With SL one can visit a client, perform a service, and from the client's >office, befor leaving, record the transaction, print an invoice, exact and >record payment. > >So, security is important, and so is undestanding whether (and why) the >transactions can be done securely. > > > > >-- >Cheers >John Summerfield > > >Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ >Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at >http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >Welcome to geek heaven. >http://thinkgeek.com/sf >------------------------------------------------------- >(un)subscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users >Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ -- Carey Durbin CD Computer Systems E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.cdcomputersys.com http://www.thebattlegrounds.net ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ------------------------------------------------------- (un)subscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
