On Jun 6, 8:32 am, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 5, 2007, at 10:30 PM, Mike Orr wrote: > > > I do think .append_whereclause should be changed to .append_to_where. > > A SQL statement can have only one WHERE clause; what you're actually > > appending is an AND operand. .append_to_where seems to get that > > across better than .append_whereclause or .append_where. The word > > "clause" is superfluous because all parts of a SQL statement are > > called "clauses". > > I know phrases like "append_to_where" are more "correct", but its a > lot of typing. I had in mind just "where()". i dont think people > trip over the meaning of multiple where() statements.
+1 for where() also for group_by() and having(), no? ...see: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03449.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
