Don't care as long as the functionality is available somehow :) Unless others have objections I say go with whatevers currently implemented.
On Dec 11, 7:52 pm, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 11, 2007, at 6:21 PM, Chris M wrote: > > > > > Okay, does this mean that options() doesn't go off the last entity or > > is this interface just in addition to that behavior? > > this currently is in lieu of the "options goes off the last entity" > idea. i tried it that way but this way felt less surprising to me. > we can do a poll if you want. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
