On Sep 9, 2014, at 3:30 AM, christian.h.m.schr...@googlemail.com wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> 
> I am currently in the process of migrating a large legacy code base I 
> inherited from SQLAlchemy 0.5 to 0.9. There is a somewhat confusing stack of 
> custom decorator magic for connection, session and transaction handling - too 
> unwieldy to post here in its entirety, but very likely the culprit for the 
> following problem: This code
> 
> @session   # custom session decorator
> def run(session=None):   # session injected here from the decorator
>     session.begin()
>     session.add(Table(name='test1'))  # 'Table' is some dummy ORM-Mapper
>     session.commit()
> 
> run()
> 
> fails with (this is py.test output):
> 
> self = <sqlalchemy.engine.base.RootTransaction object at 0x222e1d0>
> 
>     def commit(self):
>         """Commit this :class:`.Transaction`."""
>     
>         if not self._parent.is_active:
> >           raise exc.InvalidRequestError("This transaction is inactive")
> E           InvalidRequestError: This transaction is inactive
> 
> ../../.virtualenvs/solute/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/base.py:1333:
>  InvalidRequestError
>  
> 
> The logging of SQLAlchemy looks like this:
> 
> INFO:sqlalchemy.engine.base.Engine:BEGIN (implicit)
> INFO:sqlalchemy.engine.base.Engine:INSERT INTO test_session_table (name) 
> VALUES (?)
> INFO:sqlalchemy.engine.base.Engine:('test1',)
> INFO:sqlalchemy.engine.base.Engine:ROLLBACK
> 
> As can be guessed, the session is created with `autocommit=True`, and I 
> really don't want to change the semantics here (as I said: large legacy code 
> base, lots of uses for this decorator, no one really understands all the 
> moving parts any more). I *could* post the session decorator code if asked 
> for, but I'm not sure it'll be helpful, since it relies on a bunch of custom 
> connection and pooling magic.
> 
> This error only occurs when adding Mapper objects; explicitly executing an 
> analogous `INSERT` statement instead off the `.add()` works (though with a 
> spurious `ReferenceError: weakly-referenced object no longer exists`). When 
> executing explicit `BEGIN`/`COMMIT` statements as well (thus bypassing 
> SQLAlchemy's transaction handling altogether), not even the ReferenceError is 
> raised.
> 
> I'm well aware that the code I posted doesn't allow for exactly pinpointing 
> the problem - I merely hoping for some educated guesses on what may go wrong 
> in our stack, as well as some explanations (like what the RootTransaction is, 
> and what it means when it's not active).

I'm afraid I don't have much insight, the the code excerpts here aren't telling 
me anything.  I also don't know what you mean by "adding Mapper objects".  "the 
transaction is inactive" usually means you had an exception thrown that was not 
handled (e.g. session was not rolled back).


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to