Politically, if you are in the organization that was "acquired", you best bite the bullet and learn to dance the Big Gates' version of "I Shall Overcome." I don't think there is a WinCE version of SQL Server, (yet) so that might be your only real chance.
My experience with organizations that embrace all things Gates' is, pretty much any technical advantageous products which lie outside the Mickeysoft umbrella are ignored and usually completely banned as, "not conforming to organization policy." Fred -----Original Message----- From: Downey, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 9:58 AM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: RE: [sqlite] SQLite Advocacy Thank you for your replies (both yours and Jalil's). I understand that SQLite is not universally applicable. Let me give you some background to better explain my request. We currently have a product (which we inherited the responsibility from another company). This product was originally written to use SQLite. We have expanded the this product (continuing to use SQLite). Now our organization is partnered with another company which has a related product which uses SQL Server 7. This new partner is pushing my management to convert our product over to use SQL Server 7 instead of SQLite. The intent is that we can use a single database format at some point in the future. ... -----Original Message----- From: Fred Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:32 AM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: RE: [sqlite] SQLite Advocacy I think if your organization is truly looking at SQLite vs SQL Server, you need to reconsider your project specifications. You are basically comparing a Corvette to a Greyhound Bus. ...
